WikiGrowth: Difference between revisions
(Work in Progress) |
(f: Just edited some text in https://everipedia.org/wiki/Wiki/#growth-factors a: Agent a noticed that f has given this section more structure, i.e. eliminated some redundancy and made it a bulleted list. q: Why did you do that?) |
||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
CcBySa: permits anyone who credits the source author(s) to copy, edit, refactor, improve, extend, merge, make derivatives, share, use commercially. | CcBySa: permits anyone who credits the source author(s) to copy, edit, refactor, improve, extend, merge, make derivatives, share, use commercially. | ||
Ref: https://www.facebook.com/groups/everipedia.editors/ | Ref: https://www.facebook.com/groups/everipedia.editors/permalink/1711733128942625/ | ||
Latest revision as of 00:54, 1 March 2018
WikiGrowth
f: Just edited some text in https://everipedia.org/wiki/Wiki/#growth-factors
a: Agent a noticed that f has given this section more structure, i.e. eliminated some redundancy and made it a bulleted list.
q: Why did you do that?
f: There are several reasons.
q: Reason 1?
f: As a new editor in EP, this was kind of a warming up to explore and learn the features and limits of EP editing.
q: Reason 2?
a : The (bot created) articles Wiki and Wikify appear to be nearly Dupes of each other.
The second title Wikify (mis-)leads to a page, that doesn't correctly reflect the meaning of the title;
actually the page Wikify REDIRECTs to another wiki page, titled Wiki_markdown.
q: And what is the problem?
a: As long as this mismatch is not corrected, this bug pollutes the namespace of EP, by occupying the title Wikify, making it impossible to create a page, named Wikify, that really deserves the title Wikify.
q: What is the meaning of Wikify?
f: The meaning of Wikify (as a helpful bookmarklet for EP editors) is described on the ((probably) automatically misplaced) page: https://everipedia.org/wiki/wikify-1/
q: Reason 2?
f: The author f thinks: most vested EP editors may share the interest, that the EveriPedia wiki should have an optimal growth.
q: How does the edit of f contribute?
f: This structured text reads faster and draws the attention to a cited study to be discussed in the community.
q: What did you do then?
f: f created and submitted a comment to explore the research paper and initiate a discussion in the community for the mutual benefit.
q: What was the problem?
f: After submission of the comment, the text diminished into thin air.
q to @EasyC : Is this another bug in the comment handler, that authors cannot comment their edited pages?
f: Thank you to all human and not human entities that can help :)
CcBySa: permits anyone who credits the source author(s) to copy, edit, refactor, improve, extend, merge, make derivatives, share, use commercially.
Ref: https://www.facebook.com/groups/everipedia.editors/permalink/1711733128942625/