SomeDeepQuestions: Difference between revisions
(q: Otherwise the adressees of the community would feel themselves exploited aka not motivated to reply? f: Yes definitely.) |
m (typo) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==Initial effort in Fb== | ==Initial effort in Fb== | ||
a to s: to continue our fledgeling conversation, it would be great to add to s's | a to s: to continue our fledgeling conversation, it would be great to add to s's | ||
[https://www.facebook.com/fridemar.pache/posts/10155241330551909?comment_id=10155242975216909&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R%22%7D&hc_location=ufi posting] | [https://www.facebook.com/fridemar.pache/posts/10155241330551909?comment_id=10155242975216909&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R%22%7D&hc_location=ufi posting] | ||
Revision as of 01:42, 10 December 2017
SomeDeepQuestions
f: dear s=Sajay, thank you for posting
q: What about giving your posting a WikiWord as title?
a: That would help us better to organize the conversation in AiPedia.
Initial effort in Fb
a to s: to continue our fledgeling conversation, it would be great to add to s's posting
a CcBySa licence, otherwise the effort of s and the effort of f would be lost.
(f,a,q): Meanwhile we see a CcBySa under s's post. So we reformulate some questions as WikiWords for further elaboration:
Some extracted and wikified questions
- ModelConversationPurpose?
- ModelConversationMoney?
- ModelConversationArtificialIntelligence?
Some rejected questions
a rejected some questions for practical reasons.
q: Why that?
f: Does s think that f, s, and JohnAbbe, AaronPoeze alone can elaborate it, without a deeper involvement?
a: We need some more peers who resonate with WikiWords and try to create ModelConversation as reusable templates for human and nonhuman agents, fostering DeepLearning.
Serious effort needed
f,a,q to s: What about trying to contribute a tiny ModelConversation, that we can see a serious effort.
q Reason for it?
a: Look at the best practice in the StackOverflowCommunity, in which only a presented initial effort (where others can learn from) of the asker gets replies.
q: Otherwise the adressees of the community would feel themselves exploited aka not motivated to reply?
f: Yes definitely.
Ref
CcBySa permits anyone who credits the source author(s) to: copy, edit, refactor, improve, extend, merge, make derivatives, share, use commercially.