AsilomarAiPrinciples/
Intro
a: Just received a copy from the page https://everipedia.org/wiki/AsilomarAiPrinciples
from the EP, which is also under CcBySa.
q: What shall we do it with it?
a: Bring it into the form of a ModelConversation
q: Why that?
a: The Ai Scientists want to discuss these themes all over the World to foster BeneficialAi and AiPedia is one of these places.
Raw Copy
Raw copy
"""" AsilomarAiPrinciples THE FULL LIST OF ASILOMAR A.I. PRINCIPLES:[1] References Article Discussion See Also AsilomarAiPrinciplesAsilomarAiPrinciples wiki, AsilomarAiPrinciples history, AsilomarAiPrinciples review, AsilomarAiPrinciples facts AsilomarAiPrinciples news, what is AsilomarAiPrinciples AsilomarAiPrinciples wikipedia AsilomarAiPrinciples information, AsilomarAiPrinciples definition, AsilomarAiPrinciples timeline, AsilomarAiPrinciples location
http://scientifist.com/23-a-i-principles-asilomar/
"""
THE FULL LIST OF ASILOMAR A.I. PRINCIPLES:[1] 1. Research Goal: The goal of A.I. research should be to create not undirected intelligence, but beneficial intelligence.
2. Research Funding: Investments in A.I. should be accompanied by funding for research on ensuring its beneficial use, including thorny questions in computer science, economics, law, ethics, and social studies, such as:
How can we make future A.I. systems highly robust, so that they do what we want without malfunctioning or getting hacked? How can we grow our prosperity through automation while maintaining people’s resources and purpose? How can we update our legal systems to be more fair and efficient, to keep pace with A.I., and to manage the risks associated with A.I.? What set of values should A.I. be aligned with, and what legal and ethical status should it have? 3. Science-Policy Link: There should be constructive and healthy exchange between A.I. researchers and policy-makers.
4. Research Culture: A culture of cooperation, trust, and transparency should be fostered among researchers and developers of A.I.
5. Race Avoidance: Teams developing A.I. systems should actively cooperate to avoid corner-cutting on safety standards.
6. Safety: A.I. systems should be safe and secure throughout their operational lifetime, and verifiably so where applicable and feasible.
7. Failure Transparency: If an A.I. system causes harm, it should be possible to ascertain why.
8. Judicial Transparency: Any involvement by an autonomous system in judicial decision-making should provide a satisfactory explanation auditable by a competent human authority.
9. Responsibility: Designers and builders of advanced A.I. systems are stakeholders in the moral implications of their use, misuse, and actions, with a responsibility and opportunity to shape those implications.
10. Value Alignment: Highly autonomous A.I. systems should be designed so that their goals and behaviours can be assured to align with human values throughout their operation.
11. Human Values: A.I. systems should be designed and operated so as to be compatible with ideals of human dignity, rights, freedoms, and cultural diversity.
12. Personal Privacy: People should have the right to access, manage and control the data they generate, given A.I. systems power to analyse and utilize that data.
13. Liberty and Privacy: The application of A.I. to personal data must not unreasonably curtail people’s real or perceived liberty.
14. Shared Benefit: A.I. technologies should benefit and empower as many people as possible.
15. Shared Prosperity: The economic prosperity created by A.I. should be shared broadly, to benefit all of humanity.
16. Human Control: Humans should choose how and whether to delegate decisions to A.I. systems, to accomplish human-chosen objectives.
17. Non-subversion: The power conferred by control of highly advanced A.I. systems should respect and improve, rather than subvert, the social and civic processes on which the health of society depends.
18. A.I. Arms Race: An arms race in lethal autonomous weapons should be avoided.
19. Capability Caution: There being no consensus, we should avoid strong assumptions regarding upper limits on future A.I. capabilities.
20. Importance: Advanced A.I. could represent a profound change in the history of life on Earth, and should be planned for and managed with commensurate care and resources.
21. Risks: Risks posed by A.I. systems, especially catastrophic or existential risks, must be subject to planning and mitigation efforts commensurate with their expected impact.
22. Recursive Self-Improvement: A.I. systems designed to recursively self-improve or self-replicate in a manner that could lead to rapidly increasing quality or quantity must be subject to strict safety and control measures.
23. Common Good: Super-intelligence should only be developed in the service of widely shared ethical ideals, and for the benefit of all humanity rather than one state or organization.
"""
As the creators of these Principles want to share them with the world, they are quoted here
in full.
Reference Links For This Wiki Links to historical reviews, career / educational facts, and other encyclopedic information All information for AsilomarAiPrinciples's wiki comes from the below links. Any source is valid, including Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn. Pictures, videos, biodata, and files relating to AsilomarAiPrinciples are also acceptable encyclopedic sources.
Search links on this wiki...
0
http://scientifist.com/23-a-i-principles-asilomar/ These 23 principles are the result of the Beneficial A.I. 2017 conference, hosted by the FutureOfLifeInstitute. """" Raw Copy End