TheOppenheimerEffect: Difference between revisions
(TheOppenheimerEffect f to m: Dear Michelle, thank you very much for sharing this helpful essential video.) |
m (format) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
f to m: Dear Michelle, thank you very much for sharing this helpful essential video. | f to m: Dear Michelle, thank you very much for sharing this helpful essential video. | ||
q to f: Why do you call it helpful and essential? | q to f: Why do you call it helpful and essential? | ||
f: I call it essential because the highly appreciated referent Mr. Cooper gave three good example scenarios, where good intentions had unintended evil side effects. | f: I call it essential because the highly appreciated referent Mr. Cooper gave three good example scenarios, where good intentions had unintended evil side effects. | ||
q to f: And why helpful? | q to f: And why helpful? | ||
f: I wrote helpful since it could help to avoid a possible catastrophe in the case of Artificial Intelligence. | f: I wrote helpful since it could help to avoid a possible catastrophe in the case of Artificial Intelligence. | ||
q to f: Does the lecturer compares this with the Manhattan project, led by the well-known scientist Mr. Oppenheimer? | q to f: Does the lecturer compares this with the Manhattan project, led by the well-known scientist Mr. Oppenheimer? | ||
f: Yes. | f: Yes. | ||
q: And what is the essential message for us all to take home? | q: And what is the essential message for us all to take home? | ||
f: I think it is the suggestion, that we all, who are participating in the worldwide OpenAi movement (aka Singularity Network) should prioritize BeneficialAi or even a LovingAi as our common AiEthics background. | f: I think it is the suggestion, that we all, who are participating in the worldwide OpenAi movement (aka Singularity Network) should prioritize BeneficialAi or even a LovingAi as our common AiEthics background. | ||
q: Could you give a short explanation to your readers of this comment, who the agent q is? | q: Could you give a short explanation to your readers of this comment, who the agent q is? | ||
f: Thank you dear q, for asking this. q stands for a smart agent, currently simulated by a human. | f: Thank you dear q, for asking this. q stands for a smart agent, currently simulated by a human. | ||
q: Can this hopefully helpful text be used freely? | q: Can this hopefully helpful text be used freely? | ||
f: Yes, therefore I'll sign it as fridemar under CCBySa to aggregrate it in the target: | f: Yes, therefore I'll sign it as fridemar under CCBySa to aggregrate it in the target: | ||
Revision as of 23:06, 10 November 2017
TheOppenheimerEffect
f to m: Dear Michelle, thank you very much for sharing this helpful essential video.
q to f: Why do you call it helpful and essential?
f: I call it essential because the highly appreciated referent Mr. Cooper gave three good example scenarios, where good intentions had unintended evil side effects.
q to f: And why helpful?
f: I wrote helpful since it could help to avoid a possible catastrophe in the case of Artificial Intelligence.
q to f: Does the lecturer compares this with the Manhattan project, led by the well-known scientist Mr. Oppenheimer?
f: Yes.
q: And what is the essential message for us all to take home?
f: I think it is the suggestion, that we all, who are participating in the worldwide OpenAi movement (aka Singularity Network) should prioritize BeneficialAi or even a LovingAi as our common AiEthics background.
q: Could you give a short explanation to your readers of this comment, who the agent q is?
f: Thank you dear q, for asking this. q stands for a smart agent, currently simulated by a human.
q: Can this hopefully helpful text be used freely?
f: Yes, therefore I'll sign it as fridemar under CCBySa to aggregrate it in the target:
work in progress
from